Reproductive Health Matters
Volume 9, Issue 18 , Pages 105-113 , November 2001

Unmet need for reproductive health in India

  • T.K.Sundari Ravindran

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence TK Sundari Ravindran, ‘Sruti’, Ananta Housing Society, Thuruvikkal Post, Trivandrum - 695 031, Kerala, India. Fax: 91-471-44 79 74.
  • ,
  • U.S. Mishra

References 

  1. Nortman DL . Measuring the unmet need for contraceptive to space and limit births . International Family Planning Perspectives . 1982;8(4):125–134
  2. Westoff CF , Pebley AR . Alternative measures of unmet need for family planning in developing countries . International Family Planning Perspectives . 1981;7(4):126–136
  3. Westoff CF . The potential demand for family planning: a new measure of unmet need and estimates for five Latin American countries . International Family Planning Perspectives . 1988;14(2):45–53
  4. Bongaarts J . The KAP-gap and the unmet need for contraception . Population and Development Review . 1991;17(2):293–313
  5. Pritchett L . Desired fertility and the impact of population policies . Population and Development Review . 1994;20(1):1–56
  6. Ross J , Heaton L . Intended contraceptive use among women without an unmet need . International Family Planning Perspectives . 1997;23(4):148–154
  7. Bhushan I . Understanding unmet need . In: Working paper no. 4, Centre for Communication Program . Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; 1997;
  8. Becker S . Measuring unmet need: wives, husbands, or couples? . International Family Planning Perspectives . 1997;25(4):172–180
  9. Dixon-Mueller R , Germain A . Stalking the elusive ‘unmet need’ for family planning . Studies in Family Planning . 1992;23(5):330–335
  10. Jain A , Bruce J . A reproductive health approach to the objectives and assessment of family planning programmes . In: Sen  , Germain  , Chen  editor. Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment and Rights . Cambridge: Harvard Centre for Population and Development Studies; 1994;
  11. Reproductive and Child Health Programme . October 2001; mohfw.nic. in//reproheal.htm date referred
  12. Government of India  . Population situation and national Population Policy 2000 . New Delhi: National Commission on Population; 2000; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
  13. International Institute for Population Sciences . In: 5th ed.. National Family Health Survey-1 1992–1993 . India: Mumbai IIPS; 1993;
  14. International Institute for Population Sciences, ORC Macro  . In: 5th ed.. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998–1999 . India: Mumbai, IIPS; 2000;
  15. These previously unpublished data are from the Tamil Nadu Fertility Transition Study under the aegis of the ‘Project on Strategies and Financing for Human Development’, Tiruvananthapuram, supported by the UN Development Programme.

  16. Barua A , Kurz K . Reproductive health-seeking by married adolescent girls in Maharashtra, India . Reproductive Health Matters . 2001;9(17):53–62
  17. Office of the Registrar General, India, (various years). Causes of death (rural):India. New Delhi, Office of the Registrar General.
  18. Sen G , Gurumurthy A , Mukhegjee V , et al.   India . In:  Correa Sonia editors. Weighing up Cairo: Evidence from the women in the South . Suva: DAWN (Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era); 2000;
  19. This observation is based on the introduction and the various abstracts included Bandewar S , Saha S . Studies in Reproductive Health Services in India (1990–1999): Selected Annotated Bibliography . Pune and Mumbai: Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes; 2000;

PII: S0968-8080(01)90097-7

Reproductive Health Matters
Volume 9, Issue 18 , Pages 105-113 , November 2001