Power and Politics in International Funding for Reproductive Health: the US Global Gag Rule

References 

1. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary . Memorandum for the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, Subject: Restoration of the Mexico City Policy (January 22, 2001). Washington, DC: The White House; 2001; At: 〈 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/20010123-5.html 〉. Accessed 10 February 2004
2. Helms Amendment. H.R. 2506, Section 518–Prohibition on Funding for Abortions and Involuntary Sterilization (from FY 2002 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act). At: 〈 http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/global_health/pop/helms.html 〉. Accessed 21 June 2004
3. Population Action International . What You Need to Know About the Global Gag Rule Restrictions: An Unofficial Guide. Washington, DC: PAI; 2001;
4. Population Action International . Emergency Contraception and the Global Gag Rule: An Unofficial Guide. Washington, DC: PAI; 2002;
5. US Executive Office of the President . Assistance for Voluntary Population Planning, Memorandum for the Secretary of State, 29 August 2003. At: 〈 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/08/print/20030829-3.html 〉. Accessed 21 June 2004
6. Planned Parenthood Federation of America . A presentation of findings based on a national survey by Lake Snell Perry and Associates. March 2002; Unpublished report
7. Finkle JL, Crane BB. The United States at the International Conference on Population. Population and Development Review. 1985;11(1):1–28
8. Saletan W. Bearing Right: How Conservatives Won the Abortion War. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2003;
9. Nowels L. CRS Issue Brief for Congress. Population Assistance and Family Planning Programs: Issues for Congress. Washington, DC: CRS; 2003; At: 〈 http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/03Aug/IB96026.pdf 〉. Accessed 11 February 2004
10. Lasher C. US population policy since the Cairo conference. Environmental Change and Security Project Report. 1998;4:16–23
11. Section 599D, Consolidated Appropriations Act, FY 2000 (Public Law 106-113–Appendix B), 113 Stat. 1501A–130 to 132, signed into law November 29, 1999. At: 〈 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ113.106.pdf 〉. Accessed 23 February 2004
12. Cohen SA. Global Gag Rule revisited: HIV/AIDS initiative out, family planning still in. The Guttmacher Report. 2003;6(4):1–3
13. Cincotta RP, Crane BB. The Mexico City Policy and US family planning assistance. Science. 2001;294(5542):525–526
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
14. Blane J, Friedman M. Mexico City Policy Implementation Study. Washington, DC: Population Technical Assistance Project; 1990;
15. Center for Reproductive Rights . The World's Abortion Laws 2003. New York: CRR; 2003;
16. World Health Organization . Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. Geneva: WHO; 2003; At: 〈 www.who.int/reproductive-health/ publications/safe_abortion/Safe_Abortion.pdf 〉. Accessed 21 June 2004
17. International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians . General Assembly adopts resolution on women's sexual and reproductive rights. Newsletter. 2003;2:6
18. Jones AA. The “Mexico City Policy” and its effects on HIV/AIDS services in sub-saharan Africa. Boston College Third World Law Journal. 2004;24:187–222
19. Global Gag Rule Impact Project . Access Denied: US Restrictions on International Family Planning. Washington, DC: Global Gag Rule Impact Project; 2003; At: 〈 www.globalgagrule.org 〉. Accessed 21 June 2004
20. Center for Reproductive Rights . Breaking the Silence: The Global Gag Rule's Impact on Unsafe Abortion. New York: CRR; 2003; At: 〈 http://www.reproductiverights.org/pdf/bo_GGR_impact_1003.pdf 〉. Accessed 21 June 2004
21. International Planned Parenthood Federation . Held to Ransom: US funding cuts risk millions of lives. At: 〈 www.heldtoransom.org 〉. Accessed 21 June 2004
22. USAID General Notice, March 29, 2002, “Prohibition on Transactions with or the Provision of Resources and Support to Individuals and Organizations Associated with Terrorism,” and Standard Provision 13, “Prohibition of Assistance to Drug Traffickers”, June 1999. At 〈 http://www.usaid.gov/policy/ads/300/updates/iu3-0203.pdf 〉 and 〈 http://www.usaid.gov/policy/ads/200/206.pdf 〉. Accessed 1 March 2004
23. Cook RJ, Dickens BM, Fathalla M. Reproductive Health and Human Rights: Integrating Medicine, Ethics, and Law. London: Oxford University Press; 2003;
24. Cook RJ, Dickens BM. Human rights dynamics of abortion law reform. Human Rights Quarterly. 2003;25:1–39
25. United Nations . International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, G.A. res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N.GAOR Supp. (No.16) at 49, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 993 U.N.T.S. 3, entered into force Jan. 3, 1976, Article 15 (1b). At: 〈 http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr.htm 〉. Accessed 13 February 2004;
26. United Nations, Social and Economic Council, Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights . General Comment No.14 (2000) paras. 12,18,21. At 〈 http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(symbol)/E.C.12.2000.4.En?OpenDocument 〉. Accessed 13 February 2004
27. Neier A. The right to free expression under international law: implications of the Mexico City Policy. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 1987;20(1):229–250
28. United States Agency for International Development . Promoting Democracy and Good Governance. At 〈 http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/ 〉. Accessed 21 June 2004
29. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary . President Proposes $5 Billion Plan to Help Developing Nations: Remarks by the President on Global Development at the Inter-American Development Bank (March 14, 2002). Washington, DC: The White House; 2002; At: 〈 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020314-7.html 〉. Accessed 13 February 2004
30. US Department of State . International Women's Issues Newsletter. The Millennium Challenge Account: A New Approach to Development Assistance. Spring. 2003; At: 〈 http://www.state.gov/g/wi/19845.htm#millenium 〉. Accessed 13 February 2004
31. Congressional Record–Senate . Limitation Provision, 15 May 2003: S6457. At: 〈 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2003_record&page=S6457&position=all 〉. Accessed 11 February 2004
32. United States Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 (H.R. 1298-P.L. 108-25), s.301; United States Agency for International Development. Acquisition & Assistance Policy Directive 04-04: Implementation of the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Act of 2003–Eligibility for Assistance, Limitation on the Use of Funds and Opposition to Prostitution and Sex Trafficking. At 〈 http://www.usaid.gov/business-opportunities/cib/pdf/aapd04-04.pdf 2004; 〉. Accessed 23 February 2004
33. Population Action International . What You Need to Know About the Global Gag Rule and US HIV/AIDS Assistance: An Unofficial Guide. Washington, DC: PAI; 2004;
34. Block J. Sex trafficking: why the faith trade is interested in the sex trade. Conscience. 2004;25(2):32–35
35. Ipas. Communiqué from the “Action to Reduce Maternal Mortality in Africa” Regional Consultation on Unsafe Abortion; 2003 March 5-7; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. At: 〈http://www.ipas.org/english/press_room/2003/releases/03212003.asp〉. Accessed 11 February 2004.
36. Council of Europe calls on Bush to lift ban on overseas family planning aid. Agence France Press. 30 September 2003.
37. Nielson P. European responses to the HIV/AIDS pandemic: challenges ahead and role of foundations and civil society. Speech at European Policy Centre, Brussels, 3 June 2004. At: 〈 http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/04/296&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en 〉. Accessed 22 June 2004
38. Foreningen Sex & Samfund, Danish Family Planning Association. Global Gag Rule hits the front page in Denmark. Press release, 2004.
39. US Senate . US Senate Roll Call Votes 108^th Congress–1^st Session (On the Motion to Table [Motion To Table Boxer Amdt. No. 1141]); 9 July 2003; Washington, DC. At: 〈 http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00267 〉. Accessed 27 February 2004