Reproductive Health Matters
Volume 16, Issue 31, Supplement , Pages 82-89 , May 2008

Decision-Making after Ultrasound Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormality

  • Hilmar H Bijma

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    • ,
  • Agnes van der Heide

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    • ,
  • Hajo IJ Wildschut

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands

References 

  1. Petrini J, Damus K, Russell R, et al. Contribution of birth defects to infant mortality in the United States. Teratology. 2002;66(Suppl 1):S3–S6
  2. Lee K, Khoshnood B, Chen L, et al. Infant mortality from congenital malformations in the United States, 1970–1997. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001;98:620–627
  3. Lys F, De Wals P, Borlee-Grimee I, et al. Evaluation of routine ultrasound examination for the prenatal diagnosis of malformation. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 1989;30:101–109
  4. Levi S. Ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: polemics around routine ultrasound screening for second trimester fetal malformations. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2002;22:285–295
  5. Carrera JM, Torrents M, Mortera C, et al. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: 22 years' experience. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995;5:174–179
  6. Boyd PA, Chamberlain P, Hicks NR. 6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK. Lancet. 1998;352:1577–1581
  7. Wladimiroff JW, Cohen-Overbeek TE, Ursem NT, et al. Geavanceerd ultrageluidonderzoek naar aangeboren afwijkingen in Rotterdam; 20 jaar ervaring. [Twenty years of experience in advanced ultrasound scanning for fetal abnormalities in Rotterdam]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. 2003;147:2106–2110
  8. Tabor A, Zdravkovic M, Perslev A, et al. Screening for congenital malformations by ultrasonography in the general population of pregnant women: factors affecting the efficacy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2003;82:1092–1098
  9. McNay MB, Fleming JE. Forty years of obstetric ultrasound 1957–1997: from A-scope to three dimensions. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 1999;25:3–56
  10. Romano PS, Waitzman NJ. Can decision analysis help us decide whether ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities is worth it?. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 1998;847:154–172
  11. Health Council of the Netherlands. Prenatal Screening: Down's syndrome, neural tube defects, routine-ultrasonography. No.2001/11. Den Haag: Health Council of the Netherlands; 2001;
  12. Grandjean H, Larroque D, Levi S. Sensitivity of routine ultrasound screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus database. The Eurofetus Team. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 1998;847:118–124
  13. Wladimiroff JW. Routine ultrasonography for the detection of fetal structural anomalies. In:  Wildschut HIJ,  Weiner CP,  Peters TJ editor. When to Screen in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2006;p. 244–252
  14. Getz L, Kirkengen AL. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: advancing technology, soft markers for fetal chromosomal aberrations, and unacknowledged ethical dilemmas. Social Sciences and Medicine. 2003;56:2045–2057
  15. Wildschut HIJ, ten Hoope-Bender P, Borkent-Polet M, et al. Practice variation of test procedures reportedly used in routine antenatal care in the Netherlands. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1999;78:27–32
  16. Puddifoot JE, Johnson MP. The legitimacy of grieving: the partner's experience at miscarriage. Social Science and Medicine. 1997;45:837–845
  17. Kowalcek I, Huber G, Bieniakiewitz I, et al. The influence of gestational age on depressive reactions, stress and anxiety of pregnant women and their partners in relation to prenatal diagnosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003;24:239–245
  18. Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, et al. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. Health Technology Assessment. 2000;4:i-vi/1–193
  19. Harris G, Connor L, Bisits A, et al. “Seeing the baby”: pleasures and dilemmas of ultrasound technologies for primiparous Australian women. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 2004;18:23–47
  20. Reading AE, Cox DN. The effects of ultrasound examination on maternal anxiety levels. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1982;5:237–247
  21. Sklansky M, Tang A, Levy D, et al. Maternal psychological impact of fetal echocardiography. Journal of American Society of Echocardiography. 2002;15:159–166
  22. Harris CE. Aborting abnormal fetuses: the parental perspective. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 1991;8:57–68
  23. Bjorkhem G, Jorgensen C, Hanseus K. Parental reactions to fetal echocardiography. Journal of Maternal and Fetal Medicine. 1997;6:87–92
  24. Zlotogorski Z, Tadmor O, Duniec E, et al. The effect of the amount of feedback on anxiety levels during ultrasound scanning. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 1996;24:21–24
  25. Larsen T, Nguyen TH, Munk M, et al. Ultrasound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman's background knowledge, expectations, experiences and acceptances. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;15:383–386
  26. Georges E. Fetal ultrasound imaging and the production of authoritative knowledge in Greece. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1996;10:157–175
  27. Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J, et al. Women's views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth. 2002;29:225–250
  28. Statham H, Solomou W, Chitty L. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: psychological effects on women in low-risk pregnancies. Baillières Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2000;14:731–747
  29. Detraux JJ, Gillot-de Vries F, Vanden Eynde S, et al. Psychological impact of the announcement of a fetal abnormality on pregnant women and on professionals. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 1998;847:210–219
  30. Hunfeld JA, Wladimiroff JW, Passchier J, et al. Emotional reactions in women in late pregnancy (24 weeks or longer) following the ultrasound diagnosis of a severe or lethal fetal malformation. Prenatal Diagnosis. 1993;13:603–612
  31. Langer M, Ringler M. Prospective counselling after prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformations: interventions and parental reactions. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1989;68:323–329
  32. Leuthner SR, Bolger M, Frommelt M, et al. The impact of abnormal fetal echocardiography on expectant parents' experience of pregnancy: a pilot study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003;24:121–129
  33. Mitchell LM. Women's experiences of unexpected ultrasound findings. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health. 2004;49:228–234
  34. Britt DW, Risinger ST, Mans MK, et al. Devastation and relief: conflicting meanings of detected fetal abnormalities. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;20:1–5
  35. Groenewoud JH. End-of-life-decisions in medicine, empirical studies on practices and attitudes in the Netherlands. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam; 2002;
  36. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Nonaggressive obstetric management. An option for some fetal abnormalities during the third trimester. JAMA. 1989;261:3439–3440
  37. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Skupski D, et al. Ethical issues in the management of pregnancies complicated by fetal abnormalities. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 2003;58:473–483
  38. Kirkinen P, Jouppila P, Herva R. Fatal fetal abnormalities. Route of delivery and effect of the development of antepartum diagnostics in the last 13 years. Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 1992;37:645–668
  39. Spinnato JA, Cook VD, Cook CR, et al. Aggressive intrapartum management of lethal fetal abnormalities: beyond fetal beneficence. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995;85:89–92
  40. Campbell S, Johnstone FD, Holt EM, et al. Anencephaly: early ultrasonic diagnosis and active management. Lancet. 1972;2:1226–1227
  41. White-Van Mourik MC, Connor JM, et al. The psychosocial sequelae of a second trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality over a two year period. Birth Defects Original Article Series. 1992;28:61–74
  42. White-Van Mourik MC, Connor JM, Ferguson-Smith MA. Patient care before and after termination of pregnancy for neural tube defects. Prenatal Diagnosis. 1990;10:497–505
  43. Crombleholme TM, D'Alton M, Cendron M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and the pediatric surgeon: the impact of prenatal consultation on perinatal management. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1996;31:156–162
  44. Luks FI, Carr SR, Feit LR, et al. Experience with a multidisciplinary antenatal diagnosis and management model in fetal medicine. Journal of Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2003;14:333–337
  45. Aite L, Trucchi A, Nahom A, et al. Multidisciplinary management of fetal surgical abnormalities: the impact on maternal anxiety. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2002;12:90–94
  46. Kemp J, Davenport M, Pernet A. Antenatally diagnosed surgical abnormalities: the psychological effect of parental antenatal counseling. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1998;33:1376–1379
  47. Scher MS, Kidder BM, Shah D, et al. Pediatric neurology participation in a fetal diagnostic service. Pediatric Neurology. 2004;30:338–344
  48. Sandelowski M, Jones LC. Healing fictions: stories of choosing in the aftermath of the detection of fetal abnormalities. Social Science and Medicine. 1996;42:353–361
  49. Bosma JM, van der Wal G, Hosman-Benjaminse SL. Late zwangerschapsafbreking in Noord-Holland. II Zorgvuldigheid vooraf en toetsing achteraf [Late pregnancy interruption in Noord-Holland. II. Carefulness before and review afterwards]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. 1996;140:605–609
  50. Late zwangerschapsafbreking: zorgvuldigheid en toetsing. [Late termination of pregnancy: care and assessment]. Rijswijk: Netherlands Ministry of Health/Ministry of Justice; 1998;
  51. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie. Model Reglement Medisch Handelen Late Zwangerschapsafbreking bij niet met het leven verenigbare afwijkingen vallend onder categorie 1; versie dd 221003. 2003.
  52. Grevengood C, Shulman LP, Dungan JS, et al. Severity of abnormality influences decision to terminate pregnancies affected with fetal neural tube defects. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 1994;9:273–277
  53. Pryde PG, Isada NB, Hallak M, et al. Determinants of parental decision to abort or continue after non-aneuploid ultrasound-detected fetal abnormalities. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992;80:52–56
  54. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Weitzman D, et al. Decisions regarding pregnancy termination among Bedouin couples referred to third level ultrasound clinic. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 1998;76:141–146
  55. Schechtman KB, Gray DL, Baty JD, et al. Decision-making for termination of pregnancies with fetal abnormalities: analysis of 53,000 pregnancies. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;99:216–222

PII: S0968-8080(08)31372-X

doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31372-X

Reproductive Health Matters
Volume 16, Issue 31, Supplement , Pages 82-89 , May 2008

Article Tools