Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States

References 

1. Gonzales v. Carhart 127 S.CT. 1610; 2007.
2. Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.18 USC §1531; 2003.
3. Strauss LT, Gamble SB, Parker WY, et al. Abortion surveillance: United States, 2003. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summary. 2006;55(11):1–32
4. Roe v. Wade. 410 U.S. 113; 1973.
5. Tribe LH. Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: Norton; 1992;
6. Hull NEH, Hoffer W, Hoffer PC. The Abortion Rights Controversy in America: A Legal Reader. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2004;
7. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. 505 U.S. 833; 1992.
8. Haskell M. Dilation and extraction for late second trimester abortion. second trimester abortion: from every angle. National Abortion Federation Risk Management Seminar. Dallas, 13–14 September 1992. p.27–34.
9. Gorney C. Gambling with abortion: why both sides think they have everything to lose. Harpers. 2004;309(1854):33–46
10. Esacove AW. Dialogic framing: the framing/counterframing of “partial-birth” abortion. Sociological Inquiry. 2004;74(1):70–101
11. Several Sources Shelters. The Silent Scream. April 2007. At: < www.silentscream.org>
12. Baird-Windle P, Bader EJ. Targets of Hatred: Anti-Abortion Terrorism. New York: Palgrave for St. Martin's Press; 2001;
13. Gorney C. Articles of Faith: A Frontline History of the Abortion Wars. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1998;
14. Petchesky RP. Fetal images: the power of visual culture. In: The Politics of Reproduction. Feminist Studies 1987;13(2):263–92.
15. Mason C. Cracked babies and the partial birth of a nation: millennialism and fetal citizenship. Cultural Studies. 2000;14(1):35–60
16. Gallup Poll News Service. Gallup's Pulse of Democracy: Abortion. Accessed 1 April 2007. At: < www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1576&pg=1&VERSION=p>
17. Center for Reproductive Rights. So-Called ‘Partial-Birth Abortion’ Ban Legislation: By State. 2004. Accessed 17 August 2007. At: < www.reproductiverights.org/pdf/pub_bp_pba_bystate.pdf>
18. Stenberg v. Carhart. 530 U.S. 914; 2000.
19. Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. John Ashcroft; City and Country of San Francisco v. John Ashcroft. 320 F Supp 2d 957: US District Court for the Notrthern District of California; 2004.
20. National Abortion Federation et al v. John Ashcroft. 330 F Supp 2d 436: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; 2004.
21. Leroy Carhart et al v. John Ashcroft. 331 F Supp 2d 805: US District Court for the District of Nebraska; 2004.
22. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. ACOG Statement on the US Supreme Court Decision Upholding the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Press release. 18 April 2007.
23. Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, et al. Psychological responses after abortion. Science. 1990;248(4951):41–44
    • MEDLINE
24. Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, et al. Psychological factors in abortion: a review. American Psychologist. 1992;47(10):1194–1204
25. Gostin LO. Abortion politics: clinical freedom, trust in the judiciary, and the autonomy of women. JAMA. 2007;298(13):1562–1564
    • CrossRef
26. Autry AM, Hayes EC, Jacobson GF, et al. A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;187(2):393–397
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (49 KB)
    • CrossRef
27. Darney PD, Atkinson E, Hirabayashi K. Uterine perforation during second-trimester abortion by cervical dilation and instrumental extraction: a review of 15 cases. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1990;75(3 Pt 1):441–444
    • MEDLINE
28. Hogue CJ. Impact of abortion on subsequent fecundity. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1986;13(1):95–103
29. Halperin R, Zimmerman A, Langer R, et al. Laminaria dilatation and evacuation for pregnancies with mid-trimester premature rupture of membranes: a retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2002;100(2):181–184
30. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Petitioner v. Leroy Carhart, et al.: Oral Argument. Supreme Court 2007 November 8 [cited No. 05-380 July 12]; At: <www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/05-380.pdf>
31. Vesely R. Courts force new abortion methods: Legal second-trimester procedures could be harmful to women. 2007 June 4 [cited 2007 June 6]. At: < www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_6056631>
32. Blumenthal PD, Castleman LD, Jain JK. Abortion by labor induction. In:  Paul M,  Lichtenberg ES,  Borgatta L, et al. editor. A Clinician's Guide to Medical and Surgical Abortion. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1999;
33. Jackson RA, Teplin VL, Drey EA, et al. Digoxin to facilitate late second-trimester abortion: a randomized, masked, placebo-controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001;97(3):471–476
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
34. Darney PD, Rosenfield A. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):226–227
    • CrossRef
35. Jones RK, Zolna MRS, Henshaw SK, et al. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2008;40(1):6–16
    • CrossRef
36. Greene MF. The intimidation of American physicians: banning partial-birth abortion. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;356(21):2128–2129
37. Survey conducted by the Fellowship in Family Planning, May 2007, unpublished.
38. Joffe C. The abortion procedure ban: Bush's gift to his base. Dissent. 2007;(Fall):57–61
39. Chasen ST, Kalish RB, Gupta M, et al. Dilation and evacuation at >or=20 weeks: comparison of operative techniques. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;190(5):1180–1183
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (116 KB)
    • CrossRef
40. Richardson CT, Nash E. Misinformed consent: the medical accuracy of state-developed abortion counseling materials. Guttmacher Policy Review. 2006;6–11