Reproductive Health Matters
Volume 16, Issue 31, Supplement , Pages 37-45 , May 2008

Second Trimester Abortions in India

References 

  1. Chhabra R, Nuna SC. Abortion in India: An Overview. New Delhi: Veerendra Printers; 1994;
  2. Gupte M, Bandewar S, Pisal H. Abortion needs of women in India: a case study of rural Maharashtra. Reproductive Health Matters. 1997;9:77–86
  3. Karkal M. Abortion laws and the abortion situation in India. Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering. 1991;4(3):
  4. Iyengar V, Gupta M. MTP clients at a voluntary family welfare organization. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. January 1991;
  5. Choudhury DC. Survey on Needs Assessment on Abortion in Assam. Gauhati: Population Research Centre, Department of Statistics; 1999;
  6. Hirve S. Study of abortion and medical termination of pregnancy. Pune: King Edward Memorial Hospital and Research Centre, 1996. (Unpublished report).
  7. Ganatra B, et al. Induced abortions in a rural community in Western Maharashtra: prevalence and patterns. Pune: King Edward Memorial Hospital and Research Centre; 1996;
  8. Family Welfare Programme in India: Year Book 2001. New Delhi: Department of Family Welfare, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2003;
  9. Pallikadavath S, Stones RW. Maternal and social factors associated with abortion in India: a population based study. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2006;32(3):
  10. Cited in: Ravindran TKS. Gender gaps in research on abortion in India: a critical review of selected studies. Gender and Reproductive Health Research Initiative. New Delhi: CREA, 2002.
  11. Roy KK, Banerjee N, Takkar D. Pregnancy following tubal sterilization: an 11-year survey. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2000;68(1):53–54
  12. Castleman LD, Oanh KT, Hyman AG, et al. Introduction of the dilation and evacuation procedure for second-trimester abortion in Vietnam using manual vacuum aspiration and buccal misoprostol. Contraception. 2006;74(3):272–276
  13. Kelekci S, Erdemoglu E, Inan I. Randomized study on the effect of adding oxytocin to ethacridine lactate or misoprostol for second-trimester termination of pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandanavica. 2006;85(7):825–829
  14. Bhathena RK, Sheriar NK, Walvekar VR, et al. Second trimester pregnancy termination using extra-amniotic ethacridine lactate. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1990;97(11):1026–1029
  15. Allahbadia G. Comparative study of midtrimester termination of pregnancy using hypertonic saline, ethacridine lactate, prostaglandin analogue and iodine-saline. Journal of Indian Medical Association. 1992;90(9):237–239
  16. Lalitkumar S, Bygdeman M, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Mid-trimester induced abortion: a review. Human Reproduction Update. 2007;13(1):37–52
  17. Bhattacharjee N, Gangulay RP, Saha SP. Misoprostol for termination of mid-trimester post-caesarean pregnancy. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;47(1):23–25
  18. Elul B, Bracken H, et al. Unwanted pregnancy and induced abortion in Rajasthan, India: a qualitative exploration. New Delhi: Population Council; 2004;At: < www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/SAReport.pdf>. Accessed 15 June 2008
  19. Ganatra B, Manning V, Pallipamulla S. Availability of medical abortion pills and the role of chemists: a study from Bihar and Jharkhand, India. Reproductive Health Matters. 2005;13(26):65–74
  20. Hirve S. Abortion law, policy and services in India: a critical review. Reproductive Health Matters. 2004;12(24):114–121
  21. Indian Penal Code. At: <www.nrcw.nic.in/shared/sublinkimages/59.pdf>. Accessed 15 June 2008.
  22. Wadia AB. The light is ours. In: International Planned Parenthood Federation. 2001;p. 599
  23. Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971. Act No.34 of 1971. 10 August 1971. At: <www.mohfw.nic.in/MTP%20Act%201971.htm>.
  24. Hirve S. Abortion: a symposium on the multiple facets of medical termination of pregnancy. Policy and practice. December 2003;At: < www.india-seminar.com/2003/532/532%20siddhi%20hirve.htm>.Accessed 16 June 2008
  25. Key indicators for India from National Family Health Survey 3. 2005–06. At: <www.mohfw.nic.in/fact%20sheet%20Xl/IN.xls>.
  26. Sample Registration System, Census of India. At: <www.censusindia.gov.in/Vital_Statistics/SRS/Sample_Registration_System.aspx>.
  27. The Promotion of Two-Child Norm Bill. Bill No. LXVIII, 2006. At: <www.rajyasabha.nic.in/bills-ls-rs/2006/LXVIII_2006.pdf>.
  28. Murthy L. No kidding. InfoChange News & Features, August 2003. At <www.infochangeindia.org/features123.jsp>.
  29. Indian Census Data. At: <www.censusindia.net/data/chapter6.pdf>.
  30. India to create a national registry of pregnancies. 18 July 2007 At: <www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/77012.php>. Accessed 17 June 2008.
  31. India, Registrar General. Sample Registration System Bulletin. 2000;34(1):
  32. Khan ME, Barge S, Kumar N. Availability and access to abortion services in India: myth and realities. At: < www.iussp.org/Brazil2001/s20/S21_P10_Barge.pdf> Accessed 21 May 2007
  33. Duggal R, Barge S. Abortion services in India: a situational analysis. Abortion Assessment Project–India. Mumbai: CEHAT, Healthwatch; 2004;
  34. Duggal R, Ramachandran V. The abortion assessment project–India: key findings and recommendations. Reproductive Health Matters. 2004;12(Suppl.24):122–129
  35. Santhya KG, Verma S. Induced Abortion: the current scenario in India. Regional Health Forum. 2004;8(2):1
  36. Saha S, Bal R, Ghosh S, et al. Medical abortion in late second trimester – a comparative study with misoprostol through vaginal versus oral followed by vaginal route. Journal of Indian Medical Association 2006;104(2):81–82/84.
  37. Ramchandar L, Pelto PJ. The role of village health nurses in mediating abortions in rural Tamil Nadu, India. Reproductive Health Matters. 2002;10(19):64–75
  38. National Population Policy 2000. At: <populationcommission.nic.in/npp.htm>.
  39. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare notification. 13 June 2003. At: <http://mohfw.nic.in/MTP%20Rules.htm>.
  40. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Maternal Health Programme. At: < mohfw.nic.in/dofw%20website/MATERNAL%20HEALTH%20%20PROGRAMME%20%20.htm>.
  41. Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, Rules 13 June 2003. At: <www.mohfw.nic.in/MTP%20Rules.htm>.
  42. Nidadavolu V, Bracken H. Abortion and sex determination: conflicting messages in information materials in a district of Rajasthan, India. Reproductive Health Matters. 2006;14(27):160–171
  43. Gallo MF, Nghia NC. Real life is different: a qualitative study of why women delay abortion until the second trimester in Vietnam. Social Science and Medicine. 2007;64(9):1812–1822
  44. Guilbert E, Marcoux S, Rioux JE. Factors associated with the obtaining of a second trimester induced abortion. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 1994;85:402–406
  45. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. National Guideline Clearing House. At: < www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?ss=15&doc_id=7670&nbr=4469>.
  46. The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, Rules, 2003. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. At: <http://rajswasthya.nic.in/PCPNDT/03/01%20PC%20&%20PNDT%20ACT.pdf> Accessed 16 June 2008.
  47. Mundle S, Elul B, et al. Increasing access to safe abortion services in rural India: experiences with medical abortion in a primary health center. Contraception. 2007;76(1):66–70
  48. George A, Randall S. Late presentation for abortion. British Journal of Family Planning. 1996;22:12–15

PII: S0968-8080(08)31384-6

doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31384-6

Reproductive Health Matters
Volume 16, Issue 31, Supplement , Pages 37-45 , May 2008

Article Tools