Second Trimester Abortion in Viet Nam: Changing to Recommended Methods and Improving Service Delivery

References 

1. Viet Nam Committee for Population Family and Children. Population Ordinance. Chapter II, Article 10. 2003.
2. Viet Nam Ministry of Health. Health Statistics Yearbook 2006. Hanoi, 2007.
3. Nguyen DT, Khe ND. Vietnam abortion situation country report. Presented at: Advancing the role of mid-level providers in menstrual regulation and elective abortion care. Ipas, Karolinska Institute Division of International Health, Johannesburg, 2–6 December 2001.
4. Viet Nam Ministry of Health, Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Department. Research on maternal mortality in Vietnam, 2000–2001. Hanoi: MOH; 2007;
5. National Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital. Program Annual Report, 2006.
6. Tu Du Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital. Hospital Annual Report, 2007.
7. Gallo MF, Nghia NC. Real life is different: a qualitative study of why women delay abortion until the second trimester in Vietnam. Social Science and Medicine. 2007;64(9):1812–1822
8. Viet Nam Committee for Population, Family and Children. Population Ordinance. Chapter II, Article 14. 2003.
9. Viet Nam Committee for Population, Family and Children, ORC Marcro. Demographic and Health Survey 2002. Hanoi, 2003.
10. Rauch ER, Smulian JC, DePrince K, et al. Pregnancy interruption after second trimester diagnosis of fetal structural anomalities: New Jersey fetal abnormalities registry. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;193(4):1492–1497
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (140 KB)
    • CrossRef
11. World Health Organization. Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. Geneva: WHO; 2003;
12. Baird TL, Castleman LD, Hyman AG, et al. Clinician's Guide for Second Trimester Abortion. 2nd ed.. Chapel Hill NC: Ipas; 2007;
13. Vietnam Ministry of Health. National Standards and Guidelines for Reproductive Health Care Services. Hanoi: MOH; 2003;
14. Hyman AG. Filling the gap: introducing innovative second trimester abortion services in Viet Nam. Dialogue. March 2002;6(1):
15. Nguyen BH. Comparison of modified Kovacs and misoprostol for second trimester abortion: a randomised clinical trial [in Vietnamese]. Hanoi Health Service Report, 2001.
16. Phan PB, Nguyen TG. Youth Friendly Services: Project Report. June 2003.
17. Gallo MF, Nga DTH, Thuy HB, et al. Evaluation of the Comprehensive Abortion Care (CAC) Project in Vietnam: Successes, Challenges, and Future Directions. Phase I: Evaluation at the central and provincial facilities. Hanoi, 2006.
18. Viet Nam Ministry of Health, Ipas Vietnam. Evaluation of Service Delivery and Quality of Care at Facilities Introducing the Comprehensive Abortion Care (CAC) Service Delivery Approach in Vietnam: Successes, Challenges, and Future Directions. Phase II: Evaluation at the district and commune facilities. Hanoi, Vietnam, 2006.
19. Viet Nam Ministry of Health. National Strategy on Reproductive Health Care for the 2001–2010 period. Hanoi 2001.
20. Viet Nam Ministry of Health. Guidelines for Youth-Friendly Health Services [in Vietnamese]. Hanoi, 2008.