« Previous
Next »
Reproductive Health Matters
Volume 7, Issue 14
, Pages 60-70
, November 1999
Rationing polices on access to in vitro fertilisation in the national health service, UK
References
-
.
Human In-Vitro Fertilization
.
1993;
Dartmouth
-
.
First Report of the National Survey of the Funding and Provision of Infertility Services
.
London: College of Health; 1992;
-
.
Report of the Fifth National Survey of the funding and Provision of Infertility Services
.
London: College of Health; 1997;
-
.
Managing Scarcity: Priority setting and rationing in the NHS
.
Buckingham: Open University Press; 1996;
-
.
A National Health Service
.
London: HMSO; 1944;
Cmd. 6502
-
.
Tragic Choices
.
New York: Norton and Company; 1978;
-
.
Managing the New NHS: Functions and Responsibilities in the New NHS
.
Leeds: NHS Executive; 1994;
-
.
Statement of Responsibilities and Accountabilities
.
London: Department of Health; 1995;
-
.
Promoting Clinical Effectiveness: a Framework for Action in and through the NHS
.
Leeds: NHS Executive; 1996;
-
.
Local Voices: involving the local community in purchasing decisions
.
Leeds: NHS Executive; 1992;
-
.
Rationing in practice:the case of in vitro fertilisation
.
British Medical Journal
. 1993;306:1521–1524
- . Purchasing Evidence: the corollary of evidence-based purchasing . Journal of Public Health Medicine . 1997;19(1):6–10
-
.
In:
Fourth Annual Report
. London: Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority; 1995;
-
.
Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment
.
Lancet
. 1996;348(9039):1394;
Nov 23
.
Also reported in
In:
Sixth Annual Report
. London: HFEA; 1997;
-
.
In:
1st report (session 1994-5): Priority setting in the NHS: purchasing
.
HC 134-1
.
London: HMSO; 1995;
.
Priority Setting in the NHS: a discussion document
.
Tunbridge Wells: South East Institute article Public Health; 1996;
.
Setting priorities in the NHS
.
London: Royal College of Physicians of London; 1995;
.
Rationing revisited: a discussion paper
.
In:
Discussion Paper No 4
.
London: Royal College of Physicians of London; 1995;
The following give an insight into the range and breadth of the political and ethical debate on rationing in the NHS at the time the survey was conducted:
-
In:
Strosberg MA
editors.
Rationing America's Medical Care: the Oregon Plan and Beyond
. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1992;
-
.
Setting Health Care Priorities in Oregan
.
Journal of the American Medical Association
. 1991;265:2218–2225
-
.
The economics of coronary artery bypass grafting
.
British Medical Journal
. 1985;291:326
.
Logic in medicine
.
British Medical Journal
. 1987;295:1537
-
.
QUALYs and the mentally handicapped
.
Bulletin ofMedical Ethics
. 1991;13–16
April
-
.
QUALYfying the value of lifes
.
Journal ofMedical Ethics
. 1987;13:117–123
-
.
Desperately Seeking Solutions
.
London: Longman; 1997;
-
HC Debs Vol. 174 21st June 1990, Col 1021. Section 13(5) of the Act.
-
Douglas G. Assisted Reproduction and the Welfare of the Child. Current Legal Problems. 46:53–74. The survey of clinics conducted by Douglas in 1993 revealed that the aims of those who sought to exclude single women appeared to have succeeded in practice, as clinicians offering IVF treatment tended to restrict treatment to heterosexual couples in a stable relationship.
.
Making 'social judgements that go beyond the purely medical': The reproductive revolution and access to fertility treatment services
.
See also:
In:
Bridgman J
, Millns S
editor.
Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body
. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co; 1995;
-
.
Who Should We Treat?
.
Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1995;
-
.
R v. Secretary of State for Social Services, ex-pare Walker
.
In:
3 BMLR 32
.
1992;
-
In:
R v Sheffield Health Authority, ex-pare Seale
. 17 October 1994;
transcript
PII: S0968-8080(99)90007-1
« Previous
Next »
Reproductive Health Matters
Volume 7, Issue 14
, Pages 60-70
, November 1999
