Reversing the downward trend in men's share of contraceptive use

References 

1. United Nations  . Programme of Action . In: International Conference on Population and Development . Cairo . 1994;
2. United Nations  . In: Ninth revision. World Contraceptive Use Data Sheets . New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 1987, 1994, 1998;

   Estimates are based on most recently available country data, from an increasing number of countries over time. It is therefore not possible to obtain exact percentages of contraceptive use that requires male cooperation. In less developed countries, use of male methods fell from 29 per cent of total contraceptive use as reported in 1987 to 25 per cent in 1994 and 20 per cent in 1998. In more developed regions, use of male methods fell from 60 per cent of total use in 1987 to 54 per cent in 1998, largely due to a decline in use of ‘non-supply’ methods, predominantly withdrawal and periodic abstinence. The UN combines withdrawal and periodic abstinence in a ‘nonsupply’ category that includes douching and folk remedies. However, comparison of UN data with country surveys confirms that nearly all of the non-supply category is attributable to withdrawal and periodic abstinence.
3. Helzner J . Male involvement in family planning . Reproductive Health Matters . 1996;7:146–154 (May)
4. Gardner R , Blackburn RD , Upadhyay UD . Closing the condom gap . In: Ninth revision. Population Reports. Series H No. 9 . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Population Information Program; 1999;
5. World Bank  . In: Ninth revision. World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health . New York: Oxford University Press; 1993;

6. US Bureau of the Census, 1998. Calculation of demand for contraceptives through 2025, based on UN and census data requested by the author. These figures exclude China, which has 240 million couples of reproductive age and a prevalence of 83 per cent, only 18 per cent of which is due to male method use. See [2].
7. Ezeh AC , Seroussi M , Raggers H . Men's Fertility, Contraceptive Use and Reproductive Preferences . In: Demographic and Health Surveys Comparative Studies No. 18. . Calverton MD: Macro International Inc; 1996;
8. Piet-Pelon N , Rob U , Khan ME . Men in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan Reproductive Health Issues . New Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Corporation; 1999;
9. Population Council  . Natural Family Planning in the Philippines . New York: Xavier University Research for Mindanao Culture; 1993;

   Operations research family planning database project summaries, compiled by Population Council.
10. Pinkerton S , Abramson P . Effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission . Social Science and Medicine . 1999;44(9):1303–1312
11. World Health Organization Task Force on Psychosocial Research in Family Planning  . User preferences for contraceptive methods in India, Korea, the Philippines and Turkey . Studies in Family Planning . 1980;11:267–273
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
12. World Health Organization Task Force on Psychosocial Research in Family Planning  . Hormonal contraception for men: acceptability and effects on sexuality . Studies in Family Planning . 1982;13:328–342
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Cummings D , Bremner W . Prospects for new hormonal male contraceptives . Clinical Andrology . 1994;23:893–922
14. Rogow D , Horowitz S . Withdrawal: a review of the literature and an agenda for research . Studies in Family Planning . 1995;26(3):140–153
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
15. Oodit G . Withdrawal: a time honored but risky method . In: Ninth revision. Planned Parenthood Challenges . 2: London: IPPF; 1996;
16. Okun BS . Family planning in the Jewish population of Israel: correlates of withdrawal use . Studies in Family Planning . 1997;28(3):215–217
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
17. Douthwaite M , Miller P , Sultana M , et al.   Couple communication and sexual satisfaction among withdrawal users in Pakistan . Reproductive Health Matters . 1998;6(12):41–49
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (1018 KB)
    • CrossRef
18. In: Turkey Demographic and Health Survey^ . Beltsville, MD: Macro International, Inc; 1993;
19. Kayani A , Javed A , Douthwaite M , et al.   Pakistan User Satisfaction and Longevity Study . In: Ninth revision. Research Report No 12 . Islamabad: Population Council; 1998;
20. Caldwell J , Gaminiratne K , Caldwell P , et al.   The role of traditional fertility regulation in Sri Lanka . Studies in Family Planning . 1987;18:1–21
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
21. Lamptey P , Nicholas D , OfosuAmaah S , et al.   An evaluation of male contraceptives in rural Ghana . Studies in Family Planning . 1978;9:222–226
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
22. Mbizvo M , Adamchak D . Condom use and acceptance: a survey of male Zimbabweans . Central African Journal of Medicine . 1989;35:519–523
23. Knodel J , Havanon N , Pramualratana A . Prospects for increased condom use within marriage in Thailand . International Family Planning Perspectives . 1996;22(3):97–102
    • CrossRef
24. Hulton L , Falkingham J . Male contraceptive knowledge and practice: what do we know? . Reproductive Health Matters . 1996;7:90–100
25. Fapohunda B , Ruternberg N . Expanding Men's Participation in Reproductive Health in Kenya . Nairobi: African Population Policy Research Center; 1999;
26. World Health Organization  . Three hundred and thirty three million new, curable cases in 1995 . 1999; WHO (website) http://222.2ho.ch.asd/press.htm
27. In:  McNeill ET ,  Gilmore CE ,  Finger WR , et al. editor. The Latex Condom: Recent Advances, Future Directions . Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International; 1998;
28. Martinez-Manautou J , Hernandes D , Alarcon F , et al.   Introduction of no-scalpel vasectomy at the Mexican Social Security Institute . Advances in Contraception . 1991;7:193–201
29. Nirapathpongporn A , Huber D , Krieger J . No-scalpel vasectomy at the King's birthday vasectomy festival . Lancet . 1990;335:894–895
    • Abstract
    • CrossRef
30. Fathalla MF . Priority Research Needs in Sterilization . In: Ninth revision. Report No. I . World Federation of the Associations for Voluntary Sterilization; 1978;

31. Qualitative data collected by the author, 1999.
32. World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility  . Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia in normal men . Lancet . 1990;336:955–959
    • Abstract
    • CrossRef
33. World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility  . Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia or oligozoospermia in normal men . Fertility and Sterility . 1996;65:821–829
    • MEDLINE
34. Ringheim K . Whither methods for men? Emerging gender issues in contraception . Reproductive Health Matters . 1996;7:79–89 (May)
35. Atkins B , Jezowski T . In: Report on the First International Conference on Vasectomy . Ninth revision. Studies in Family Planning . 14: 1983;p. 89–95
    • CrossRef
36. Vernon R . Making vasectomy services more acceptable to men . International Family Planning Perspectives . 1991;17:55–60
    • CrossRef
37. Ross J , Huber D . Acceptance and prevalence of vasectomy in developing countries . Studies in Family Planning . 1983;14:67–72
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
38. Nigam SK , Malik SK , Das HC . A profile of acceptors of no-scalpel vasectomy . Journal of Family Welfare . 1994;40:19–21
39. Jezowski T , Alaracon F , Juarez C , et al.   A Successful National Program for Expanding Vasectomy Services: The Experience of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social . AVSC Working Paper No. 8 . 1995; May. Available online at www.avsc.org/workpap/wp8.
40. Wilkinson DI , Wegner MN , Mwageni N , et al.   Improving vasectomy services in Kenya: lessons from a mystery client study . Reproductive Health Matters . 1996;7:115–121 (May)
41. Population Council  . Africa ORTA Project . In: Effects of Vasectomy Promotion Project on Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour among Men in Dar es Salaam,Tanzania. Sept (6) . Ninth revision. USAID Cooperative Agreement No CCP-3050-A-00-4103-00 . 1997;
42. DeVincenzi I . A longitudinal study of human inmmunodeficiency virus transmission by heterosexual partners . New England Journal of Medicine . 1994;33(16):341–346
43. Miller K , Miller M , Askew I , et al.   Clinic-based Family Planning and Reproductive Health Services in Africa: Findings from Situation Analysis Studies . New York: Population Council; 1998;
44. Population Council  . A Qualitative Investigation into the Use of Withdrawal . In: Ninth revision. Final Report . Islamabad: Ministry of Population Welfare and Population Council; 1998;
45. Rahim T . Promoting contraceptive methods to men in Pakistan: innovations from the field . In: Presentation to AVSC/Reproductive Health Alliance Meeting . London, May . 1999;
46. Landry E , Ward V . Perspectives from couples on the vasectomy decision: a sixcountry study. Beyond Acceptability: Users' Perspectives on Contraception . In:  Ravindran TKS ,  Berer M ,  Cottingham J editor. Reproductive Health Matters for WHO, London. . 1997;
47. Vernon R . Operations research on promoting vasectomy in three Latin American Countries . International Family Planning Perspectives . 1996;22(1):26–31
    • CrossRef
48. Vernon R , Ojeda G , Vega A . Operations Research on Different Approaches for Vasectomy Service Provision in Colombia . In: Ninth revision. Final Technical Report . Bogota: Asociación ProBienestar de la Familia Colombiana (PROFAMILIA) and Population Council; 1989;
49. Liskin L , Benoit E , Blackburn R . Vasectomy: New Opportunities . In: Ninth revision. Population Reports. Series D, No. 5 . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Population Information Program; 1992;
50. Nerguaye-Tetteh J . Starting from scratch: meeting men's needs in Ghana . In: Presentation to AVSC/ Reproductive Health Alliance Europe meeting on Male Contraception: Preparing for the Future . London . 1999;
51. Alarçon F , Juarez C , Ward V , et al.   Vasectomy DecisionMaking in Mexico . New York: AVSC International; 1995;
52. Gural D , Gokgol T , Fincancioglu N , et al.   Vasectomy: an acceptable method in Turkey . In: Paper presented at 121st Annual American Public Health Association meeting . San Francisco, 24–28 October . 1993;
53. Lamprecht V , Grummer-Strawn V . Development of new formulas to identify the fertile time of the menstrual cycle . Contraception . 1996;54(6):339–343
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (493 KB)
    • CrossRef
54. Faúndes A , Osis MJD , Duarte GA . Evaluation of the use of the “Collar” as a natural method of family planning . In: Ninth revision. Final Report to the Centers for Mothers and Children's Research of Campinas (CEMICAMP) . 1997; Campinas, Brazil
55. Seex J . Making space for young men in family planning clinics . Reproductive Health Matters . 1996;7:111–114 (May)
56. Rix BA . The condom challenge . Reproductive Health Matters . 1996;7:107–110 (May)
57. Condoms: now more than ever . In: Ninth revision. Population Reports . Vol 18: Baltimore: Population Information Program, Center for Communications Programs, Johns Hopkins University; 1990; No.3
58. Richters J . Researching condoms: the laboratory and the bedroom . Reproductive Health Matters . 1994;4:55–62 (Nov)
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (1574 KB)
    • CrossRef
59. Lin L , Shizhong W , Jian G , et al.   Improving condom use in Sichuan, China: findings from a qualitative study . Reproductive Health Matters . 1996;7:101–106 (May)
60. Drennan M . Reproductive Health: New Perspectives on Men's Participation . In: Ninth revision. Population Reports. Series J, No 46 . Baltimore: Population Information Program, Center for Communications Programs, Johns Hopkins University; 1998;